• Thank you for visiting Buffy-Boards. You obviously have exceptional taste. We just want you to know that:

    1. You really should register so you can chat with us!

    2. Fourteen thousand people can't be wrong.

    3. Buffy-Boards loves you.

    4. See 1 through 3.

    Come on, register already!

Killing off a main character - always the plan?

Taake

Under the sea
Staff member
Joined
Jan 1, 2010
Messages
18,332
Age
37
Location
Stockholm, Swe
Black Thorn
Was the plan from the start to kill off Doyle in season 1?

I feel like in discussions Doyle’s early death is often spoken of in connection to the actor’s real life addiction problems and thus a need to get him off the show…

… but when I was listening to Joss’ commentary on the Buffy pilot, he speaks of having wanted to put Jesse in the title sequence for the shock value of killing him off immediately, but they didn’t have the time or budget for two title sequences so it wasn’t done… then he says something like ”but I got to do that now on Angel instead” (paraphrasing), which makes it sound as though it was always the plan to remove Doyle at an early stage?

Or did they put the first victim-girl in the title sequence for the first ep? I can’t remember.
 

AlphaFoxtrot

Scooby
Joined
Sep 11, 2017
Messages
2,692
Age
41
Glenn Quinn died on 12/2/2002. S1 DVD came out in 1/2002. Any thing said about his termination prior to his death is best understood as a lie designed to protect him from being outed as an addict, in hopes he would recover and be available again for work.
 
Taake
Taake
That makes sense

AlphaFoxtrot

Scooby
Joined
Sep 11, 2017
Messages
2,692
Age
41
P.S. I have no problem with the idea that Joss wanting to kill off a main character was one of those ideas looking for a home, and he kind of took the opportunity when it was presented to him.

I think Jesse could have been a true stunner. I remember Krista Starr's death in the Blade pilot, and being totally surprised. If Doyle's heroic sacrifice was intended to stun the audience, Joss loss his touch a lot earlier than we all now think.

Special shout out to Derek Reese. That's how you kill someone unexpectedly.
 

Btvs fan

Scooby
Joined
Feb 11, 2019
Messages
1,880
Age
41
Was the plan from the start to kill off Doyle in season 1?

I feel like in discussions Doyle’s early death is often spoken of in connection to the actor’s real life addiction problems and thus a need to get him off the show…

… but when I was listening to Joss’ commentary on the Buffy pilot, he speaks of having wanted to put Jesse in the title sequence for the shock value of killing him off immediately, but they didn’t have the time or budget for two title sequences so it wasn’t done… then he says something like ”but I got to do that now on Angel instead” (paraphrasing), which makes it sound as though it was always the plan to remove Doyle at an early stage?

Or did they put the first victim-girl in the title sequence for the first ep? I can’t remember.

I think it was going to be later in the season if he was killed off. I Got You Under My Skin was originally written with Doyle in it for example.


Greenwalt on the Angel Reunion said that they probably would've brought the Actor back if he'd cleaned up.
Glenn Quinn died on 12/2/2002. S1 DVD came out in 1/2002. Any thing said about his termination prior to his death is best understood as a lie designed to protect him from being outed as an addict, in hopes he would recover and be available again for work.

Iv seen an interview from 01 where Joss Whedon is making fun of Glen Quinn and very uncomplimentary. I always took those oh JW fired him he he could get cleaned up a nice spin on it after the fact.
I think the real problem was GQ was best friends with David Boreanaz (Christian Kane said him and DB would go hang out at Glen Quinns club) and the idea of him leading there lead on a Brand new spin off down that route of drugs and turning up wasted on set would be worrying.

Otoh Nick Brendon had some pretty bad addiction problems and yet he kept his job. They simply gave a lot of his stuff to Tom Lenk instead
 

AlphaFoxtrot

Scooby
Joined
Sep 11, 2017
Messages
2,692
Age
41
Re: Addiction: Yeah, Glenn getting David hooked would basically kill the show, and probably David's career. I would imagine given both ME and WB's reliance on young actors, keeping drugs off set would be a priority.

I'm not really certain why ME or the WB would look bad for firing him. It's clear his drug problem was affecting his work. The only reason they would look bad if they fired him without an offer of rehab.
 

Plasma

Spooky
Joined
Feb 16, 2022
Messages
2,721
Age
24
Location
Westchester, NY
Black Thorn
I don’t believe it was the original plan, but it just worked out. Though it was sad to lose Glenn (prior to his passing), I would actually argue that his character left a more lasting impact after his on-screen death.

His real-life passing is a tragedy, of course, but at the very least they managed to write him off in a way that was very respectful of him and his inner demons
 

Mr Trick

Scooby
Joined
Jan 9, 2015
Messages
16,702
Age
42
Location
London, UK
I don't think it was the original plan no. Setting him up as one of the big characters of the main cast would suggest that he had a longer future than just S1. It may have been better to have given him most of S1 so the fans would have grown more attached to him by the point of the character's death. I agree he was at least given a good send off, and its impact on the other characters was sold well.

My question is did they always plan on Wesley joining the main cast? My guess is yes? I'm guessing maybe that was speeded up because of what happened with Quinn?
 

Synch

Potential
Joined
Mar 19, 2020
Messages
110
Age
45
Dunno it was the plan at least so early on. Maybe by the end of Season 1.

David Greenwalt:

Look, I totally support actors laughing and talking right up until the call of action. Except when they're laughing at their performance and their lack of professionalism. I took him into my little motor home, we were in downtown L.A., and let's say, this was around episode four of five. I said to him, 'Look me in the eye. I'm a serial killer. You're going to die. You may not come to my set not knowing your lines. A lot of these people are driving a long way here to work, and they have eighteen-hour days. They work very, very hard for a hell lot less money than you're making, and I will not stand for it. Do you understand me?' And he began to cry. So I assumed he understood me, but then of course absolutely nothing changed and we ended up killing him, heroically, in episode nine.

Slayers & Vampires page 336
 
Joined
Mar 3, 2023
Messages
9
Age
29
I don't think it was planned from the start at all, I heard whistler was originally supposed to be in Angel but they couldn't get the actor so they created a new character. From all that i have read I feel Glenn's behaviour on set is what ultimately led to Doyle's death on the show.
 

Tome

Berktwad
Joined
Dec 14, 2009
Messages
3,098
Location
Canada
Black Thorn
I'm pretty sure he was always going to die, but they planned to bring him back in season 4.

I remember reading that the payoff for the whole Cordy, Doyle, PTB visions story-arc would have concluded differently. No Jasmine, instead Doyle being brought back and teaming up with Cordelia against Angel. Apparently the sword training Cordy had done with Angel would have paid off with a sword fight between Angel and Cordy at the end of the season. Angel would have had to stab her to save the world, similarly to how Buffy did it to him in S2 of BtVS.

As much as I enjoyed most of S4, I was always curious on how different this would have been acted out and played out. I'm not even sure how Connor would have been used in that different context. Definitely no sex between Cordy and him, that's for sure.
 
Top Bottom